Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), a practice commonly carried out to “initiate teenagers into womanhood according to Sebei traditional rites”, had been banned by Nigeria’s former president who before stepping down, made sure his legacy boasted fighting for women’s rights and protections.
The ban falls under the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act 2015 that was passed in Senate on May 5 and recently enacted into law,also prevents men from leaving their families without providing financial support, according to Reuters.
Before then, “More than 130 million girls and women have experienced female genital mutilation or cutting …”
As Nigeria APlus reports, women’s rights activists and public health groups have been campaigning against FGM for years now and are no doubt celebrating the monumental victory. The inhumane practice removes parts or all of a girl’s genitalia – often at a very young age and without the female’s consent – and often leads to severe health problems for the mutilated individual.
According to UNICEF, “More than 130 million girls and women have experienced FGM/C in 29 countries in Africa and the Middle East where the practice is most common.” Thankfully, because activists have been campaigning against the practice for a few decades now, teenage girls in countries that still practice FGM are one-third less likely to undergo the procedure than thirty years ago.
With the new law criminalizing this procedure, it is hoped the ban will fully eliminate the practice and be strongly enforced to combat any existing societal pressures.
As the World Health Organization (WHO) shares, there are many immediate harmful effects caused by the FGM procedure, not limited to hemorrhage (bleeding), bacterial infection, open sores, and long-term consequences such as infertility, childbirth complications and recurring bladder infections.
As stated in another UNICEF report, communities who practice FGM often do so to reduce sexual desire in women and to initiate girls to womanhood, among other purposes. Because of such beliefs, nearly 1/4 (25%) of women in Nigeria have undergone the painful procedure, reports The Guardian.
Activist Stella Mukasa, the director of Gender, Violence and Rights at the International Center for Research on Women, explains the complexity of the implementation of the new law banning FGM/C.
“It is crucial that we scale up efforts to change traditional cultural views that underpin violence against women. Only then will this harmful practice be eliminated.”
The legislation passed by Nigeria’s president has for the most part been received positively by women’s rights advocates. However, it has been cautioned that legislation alone will likely not be enough to eradicate the practice so deeply-rooted in familial and ethnic customs.
As BeyondBlindfold summarizes, real change must be cultural, not merely political.
“It may be difficult for families to abandon the practice without support from the wider community. In fact, it is often practiced even when it is known to inflict harm upon girls because the perceived social benefits of the practice are deemed higher than its disadvantages”- (World Health Organization, 2008).
Still, the progressive legislation is a step in the right direction and deserves to be celebrated.
Sarah Demant, the Senior Director for Amnesty International USA’s identity and discrimination unit, told Quartz:
“We welcome this ban as we welcome any ban on FGM, in any country, but it’s unclear whether other countries will do the same.”
Raising awareness about the issue is step one; you can be an activist for change by sharing this article.
To partner with Peregrine Reads on this initiative or to share your ideas, kindly send a mail to email@example.com. Your suggestions are highly welcome and appreciated!
Do you have an article you’ve written or would like to write? Something else you’d like to share with us on Peregrine Reads? Wish to be Interviewed? Don’t hesitate to send submissions/Interview request to firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com. Thank You.